移动端阅览
1.中南大学湘雅二医院肿瘤科,长沙 410011
2.中南大学湘雅二医院药学部,长沙 410011
熊慧,Email: xh7902@163.com, ORCID: 0009-0008-7908-3772
全玮旎,Email: quanweini1123@163.com, ORCID: 0009-0001-0787-8102
马进安,主任医师,Email: majinancs@csu.edu.cn, ORCID: 0000-0002-9719-9348
收稿:2025-06-04,
纸质出版:2026-02-28
熊慧, 全玮旎, 刘平, 吴元强, 邱振华, 向晓康, 颜苗, 马进安. 穿刺组织浸洗液在非小细胞肺癌的EGFR基因突变检测中的应用[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2026, 51(2): 266-276.
XIONG Hui, QUAN Weini, LIU Ping, WU Yuanqiang, QIU Zhenhua, XIANG Xiaokang, YAN Miao, MA Jin’an. Application of puncture tissue rinse solution in the detection of EGFR gene mutations in non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Journal of Central South University. Medical Science, 2026, 51(2): 266-276.
熊慧, 全玮旎, 刘平, 吴元强, 邱振华, 向晓康, 颜苗, 马进安. 穿刺组织浸洗液在非小细胞肺癌的EGFR基因突变检测中的应用[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2026, 51(2): 266-276. DOI:10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2026.250301.
XIONG Hui, QUAN Weini, LIU Ping, WU Yuanqiang, QIU Zhenhua, XIANG Xiaokang, YAN Miao, MA Jin’an. Application of puncture tissue rinse solution in the detection of EGFR gene mutations in non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Journal of Central South University. Medical Science, 2026, 51(2): 266-276. DOI:10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2026.250301.
目的
2
非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC)的精准靶向治疗需要基于基因突变的分子分型,尤其是包括表皮生长因子受体(epidermal growth factor recepto
r,
EGFR
)在内的驱动基因突变的检测,对于晚期和转移性NSCLC患者的治疗决策至关重要。目前临床核酸获取来源包括肿瘤组织石蜡标本、胸腔积液离心后的细胞学标本、血液、胸腔积液上清等体液中的游离DNA。本研究旨在采用肺穿刺活检组织的双蒸水浸洗液提取的核酸进行基因突变检测,验证该核酸来源的可行性,并分析其检测结果与基于穿刺活检组织的二代测序(next-generation sequencing,NGS)检测结果的一致性,为后续的病理诊断与治疗提供依据。
方法
2
纳入中南大学湘雅二医院肿瘤科收治的临床诊断为NSCLC的女性患者,在CT引导下经皮肺穿刺活检,活检组织通过石蜡包埋制作切片进行NGS检测;同时提取活检组织双蒸水浸洗液中的DNA,采用超扩增阻滞突变系统-聚合酶链式反应(super amplification refractory mutation system-polymerase chain reaction,Super-ARMS)法进行
EGFR
基因突变检测,DNA剩余量符合质控标准的组织标本进一步行NGS基因检测。比较穿刺活检组织双蒸水浸洗液的基因检测结果与相应石蜡切片标本的NGS基因检测结果的一致性。此外,分别测定经皮肺穿刺活检标本及穿刺针浸洗液的DNA含量,比较二者的差异。
结果
2
对于29例NSCLC患者,穿刺活检组织双蒸水浸洗液Super-ARMS法检测出
EGFR
基因突变阳性19例、阴性10例,组织石蜡样本NGS法检测出
EGFR
基因突变阳性20例、阴性9例。穿刺活检组织双蒸水浸洗液Super-ARMS法对比组织石蜡样本NGS法的敏感度为95%,特异度为100%,阳性预测值为100%,阴性预测值为90%,准确率为96.5%。6例穿刺活检组织双蒸水浸洗液经Super-ARMS法后的DNA符合质控标准,行NGS基因检测的结果显示
EGFR
基因突变阳性3例、阴性3例,与Super-ARMS法完全一致,与组织石蜡样本NGS检测结果相符。穿刺活检组织双蒸水浸洗液Super-ARMS法的
EGFR
基因检测需1~2 d,NGS检测需7 d,组织石蜡样本NGS检测需14~15 d。3例NSCLC穿刺组织双蒸水浸洗液与穿刺针浸洗液的DNA含量配对比较结果显示,组织浸洗液DNA含量高于穿刺针浸洗液DNA含量。
结论
2
CT引导下经皮肺穿刺活检标本的双蒸水浸洗液提取的DNA,可作为快速高效获得NSCLC基因分型的核酸标本来源,尽早为临床诊疗提供依据。
Objective
2
Precision targeted therapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) relies on molecular classification based on gene mutations. Detection of driver gene mutations
particularly epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations
is crucial for treatment decision-making in locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC. Currently
clinical sources of nucleic acids include formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissues
cytological specimens from centrifuged pleural effusion
blood
and circulating free DNA in body fluids such as pleural effusion supernatant. This study aims to extract nucleic acids from the double-distilled water rinse solution of lung biopsy specimens for gene mutation detection
to evaluate the feasibility of this nucleic acid source
and to analyze the concordance between its detection results and those obtained from tissue-based next-generation sequencing (NGS)
thereby providing a basis for subsequent pathological diagnosis and treatment.
Methods
2
Female patients clinically diagnosed with NSCLC and admitted to the Department of Oncology
the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University were included. CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsy was performed. Biopsy tissues were processed into paraffin-embedded sections for NGS testing. Meanwhile
DNA was extracted from the double-distilled water rinse solution of biopsy tissues
and EGFR gene mutations were detected using the super amplification refractory mutation system-polymerase chain reaction (Super-ARMS). Samples with remaining DNA meeting quality control standards were further subjected to NGS. The concordance between gene mutation results from the rinse solution and those from corresponding FFPE tissue samples was analyzed. In addition
DNA concentrations from percutaneous biopsy specimens and from the rinse solution of the puncture needle were measured and compared.
Results
2
Among 29 NSCLC patients
Super-ARMS of the biopsy tissue rinse solution detected 19
EGFR
mutation-positive cases and 10 negative cases
while NGS of FFPE tissue samples detected 20 positive cases and 9 negative cases. Compared with tissue NGS
the rinse solution Super-ARMS showed a sensitivity of 95%
specificity of 100%
positive predictive value of 100%
negative predictive value of 90%
and an overall accuracy of 96.5%. In 6 cases
DNA from the rinse solution met quality control standards after Super-ARMS and was further analyzed by NGS
showing 3
EGFR
mutation-positive and 3 negative cases. These results were completely consistent with those obtained by Super-ARMS and were concordant with tissue-based NGS results. The turnaround time for
EGFR
mutation d
etection using rinse solution Super-ARMS was 1-2 days
compared with 7 days for NGS using rinse solution DNA and 14-15 days for NGS using FFPE tissue samples. In 3 paired NSCLC samples
the DNA concentration of tissue rinse solution was higher than that of the puncture needle rinse solution.
Conclusion
2
TDNA extracted from the double-distilled water rinse solution of CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsy specimens can serve as a rapid and efficient nucleic acid source for NSCLC genotyping
enabling earlier support for clinical diagnosis and treatment.
Siegel RL , Giaquinto AN , Jemal A . Cancer statistics, 2024 [J ] . CA Cancer J Clin , 2024 , 74 ( 1 ): 12 - 49 . https://doi.org/10. 3322/caac.21820 https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21820 .
Bray F , Laversanne M , Sung H , et al . Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries [J ] . CA Cancer J Clin , 2024 , 74 ( 3 ): 229 - 263 . https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21834 https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21834 .
Kryczka J , Kryczka J , Czarnecka-Chrebelska KH , et al . Molecular mechanisms of chemoresistance induced by cisplatin in NSCLC cancer therapy [J ] . Int J Mol Sci , 2021 , 22 ( 16 ): 8885 . https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22168885 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22168885 .
Han BH , Tjulandin S , Hagiwara K , et al . EGFR mutation prevalence in Asia-Pacific and Russian patients with advanced NSCLC of adenocarcinoma and non-adenocarcinoma histology: The IGNITE study [J ] . Lung Cancer , 2017 , 113 : 37 - 44 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.08.021 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.08.021 .
Soo RA , Reungwetwattana T , Perroud HA , et al . Prevalence of EGFR mutations in patients with resected stages I to III NSCLC: results from the EARLY-EGFR study [J ] . J Thorac Oncol , 2024 , 19 ( 10 ): 1449 - 1459 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho. 2024.06.008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2024.06.008 .
Melosky B , Kambartel K , Häntschel M , et al . Worldwide prevalence of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis [J ] . Mol Diagn Ther , 2022 , 26 ( 1 ): 7 - 18 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s40291-021-00563-1 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40291-021-00563-1 .
Zhu C , Zhuang WH , Chen LM , et al . Frontiers of ctDNA, targeted therapies, and immunotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer [J ] . Transl Lung Cancer Res , 2020 , 9 ( 1 ): 111 - 138 . https://doi. org/10.21037/tlcr.2020.01.09 https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr.2020.01.09 .
Wu JJ , Lin ZH . Non-small cell lung cancer targeted therapy: drugs and mechanisms of drug resistance [J ] . Int J Mol Sci , 2022 , 23 ( 23 ): 15056 . https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232315056 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232315056 .
Meyer ML , Fitzgerald BG , Paz-Ares L , et al . New promises and challenges in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer [J ] . Lancet , 2024 , 404 ( 10454 ): 803 - 822 . https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01029-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01029-8 .
Aggarwal C , Bubendorf L , Cooper WA , et al . Molecular testing in stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer: Approaches and challenges [J ] . Lung Cancer , 2021 , 162 : 42 - 53 . https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.lungcan.2021.09.003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.09.003 .
Ettinger DS , Wood DE , Aggarwal C , et al . NCCN guidelines insights: non-small cell lung cancer, version 1.2020 [J ] . J Natl Compr Cancer Netw , 2019 , 17 ( 12 ): 1464 - 1472 . https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2019.0059 https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2019.0059 .
Ettinger DS , Wood DE , Aisner DL , et al . NCCN guidelines insights: non-small cell lung cancer, version 2.2021 [J ] . J Natl Compr Canc Netw , 2021 , 19 ( 3 ): 254 - 266 . https://doi.org/10. 6004/jnccn.2021.0013 https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2021.0013 .
Ettinger DS , Wood DE , Aisner DL , et al . Non-small cell lung cancer, version 3.2022, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology [J ] . J Natl Compr Canc Netw , 2022 , 20 ( 5 ): 497 - 530 . https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2022.0025 https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2022.0025 .
Chang YS , Tu SJ , Chen YC , et al . Mutation profile of non-small cell lung cancer revealed by next generation sequencing [J ] . Respir Res , 2021 , 22 ( 1 ): 3 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-020-01608-5 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-020-01608-5 .
Koboldt DC . Best practices for variant calling in clinical sequencing [J ] . Genome Med , 2020 , 12 ( 1 ): 91 . https://doi.org/10. 1186/s13073-020-00791-w https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-020-00791-w .
Mosele F , Remon J , Mateo J , et al . Recommendations for the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for patients with metastatic cancers: a report from the ESMO Precision Medicine Working Group [J ] . Ann Oncol , 2020 , 31 ( 11 ): 1491 - 1505 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2020.07.014 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2020.07.014 .
Larson NB , Oberg AL , Adjei AA , et al . A clinician’s guide to bioinformatics for next-generation sequencing [J ] . J Thorac Oncol , 2023 , 18 ( 2 ): 143 - 157 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2022. 11.006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2022.11.006 .
Ren JH , Liu RJ . The implication of liquid biopsy in the non-small cell lung cancer: potential and expectation [M ] // Liquid Biopsies . New York, NY : Springer US , 2023 : 145 - 163 . https://doi. org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3346-5_10 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3346-5_10 .
Rijavec E , Coco S , Genova C , et al . Liquid biopsy in non-small cell lung cancer: highlights and challenges [J ] . Cancers , 2019 , 12 ( 1 ): 17 . https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12010017 https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12010017 .
Chouaid C , Dujon C , Do P , et al . Feasibility and clinical impact of re-biopsy in advanced non small-cell lung cancer: a prospective multicenter study in a real-world setting (GFPC study 12-01) [J ] . Lung Cancer , 2014 , 86 ( 2 ): 170 - 173 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.08.016 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.08.016 .
Hotta K , Ninomiya K , Ichihara E , et al . Significance of re-biopsy of histological tumor samples in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in clinical practice [J ] . Int J Clin Oncol , 2019 , 24 ( 1 ): 41 - 45 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-018-1344-x https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-018-1344-x .
官绍年 , 陈迎珠 , 卓明磊 , 等 . 非小细胞肺癌EGFR基因突变检测的临床应用进展 [J ] . 临床检验杂志 , 2020 , 38 ( 2 ): 130 - 136 . https://doi.org/10.13602/j.cnki.jcls.2020.02.13 https://doi.org/10.13602/j.cnki.jcls.2020.02.13 .
GUAN Shaonian , CHEN Yingzhu , ZHUO Minglei , et al . Progress in clinical application of EGFR gene mutation detection in non-small cell lung cancer [J ] . Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Science , 2020 , 38 ( 2 ): 130 - 136 . https://doi.org/10.13602/j.cnki.jcls.2020.02.13 https://doi.org/10.13602/j.cnki.jcls.2020.02.13 .
Johnson M , Garassino MC , Mok T , et al . Treatment strategies and outcomes for patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer resistant to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors: Focus on novel therapies [J ] . Lung Cancer , 2022 , 170 : 41 - 51 . https://doi. org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.05.011 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.05.011 .
Yoneda K , Imanishi N , Ichiki Y , et al . A liquid biopsy in primary lung cancer [J ] . Surg Today , 2019 , 49 ( 1 ): 1 - 14 . https://doi. org/10.1007/s00595-018-1659-2 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-018-1659-2 .
Rolfo C , Mack P , Scagliotti GV , et al . Liquid biopsy for advanced NSCLC: a consensus statement from the international association for the study of lung cancer [J ] . J Thorac Oncol , 2021 , 16 ( 10 ): 1647 - 1662 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2021. 06.017 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2021.06.017 .
Nikanjam M , Kato S , Kurzrock R . Liquid biopsy: current technology and clinical applications [J ] . J Hematol Oncol , 2022 , 15 ( 1 ): 131 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-022-01351-y https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-022-01351-y .
Lin J , Gu Y , Du R , et al . Detection of EGFR mutation in supernatant, cell pellets of pleural effusion and tumor tissues from non-small cell lung cancer patients by high resolution melting analysis and sequencing [J ] . Int J Clin Exp Pathol , 2014 , 7 ( 12 ): 8813 - 8822 .
Klein EA , Richards D , Cohn A , et al . Clinical validation of a targeted methylation-based multi-cancer early detection test using an independent validation set [J ] . Ann Oncol , 2021 , 32 ( 9 ): 1167 - 1177 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2021.05.806 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2021.05.806 .
Chabon JJ , Hamilton EG , Kurtz DM , et al . Integrating genomic features for non-invasive early lung cancer detection [J ] . Nature , 2020 , 580 ( 7802 ): 245 - 251 . https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2140-0 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2140-0 .
Nair VS , Hui AB , Chabon JJ , et al . Genomic profiling of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in lung cancer [J ] . Cancer Res , 2022 , 82 ( 16 ): 2838 - 2847 . https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can- 22-0554 https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-22-0554 .
Guibert N , Tsukada H , Hwang DH , et al . Liquid biopsy of fine-needle aspiration supernatant for lung cancer genotyping [J ] . Lung Cancer , 2018 , 122 : 72 - 75 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan. 2018.05.024 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.05.024 .
Sun J , Ma Q , Chen H , et al . Clinical value of cfDNA content in peripheral blood of patients with triple-negative breast cancer [J ] . Proc Anticancer Res , 2023 , 7 ( 4 ): 43 - 48 . https://doi.org/10. 26689/par.v7i4.5179 https://doi.org/10.26689/par.v7i4.5179 .
Song P , Wu L , Yan Y , et al . Limitations and opportunities of technologies for the analysis of cell-free DNA in cancer diagnostics [J ] . Nat Biomed Eng , 2022 , 6 ( 3 ): 232 - 245 . https://doi. org/10.1038/s41551-021-00837-3 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-021-00837-3 .
Yamaguchi T , Akahane T , Harada O , et al . Next-generation sequencing in residual liquid-based cytology specimens for cancer genome analysis [J ] . Diagn Cytopathol , 2020 , 48 ( 11 ): 965 - 971 . https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.24511 https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.24511 .
Zhang P , Wu X , Tang M , et al . Detection of EGFR gene mutation status from pleural effusions and other body fluid specimens in patients with lung adenocarcinoma [J ] . Thorac Cancer , 2019 , 10 ( 12 ): 2218 - 2224 . https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13201 https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13201 .
Pascual J , Attard G , Bidard FC , et al . ESMO recommendations on the use of circulating tumour DNA assays for patients with cancer: a report from the ESMO Precision Medicine Working Group [J ] . Ann Oncol , 2022 , 33 ( 8 ): 750 - 768 . https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.annonc.2022.05.520 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2022.05.520 .
Passaro A , Leighl N , Blackhall F , et al . ESMO expert consensus statements on the management of EGFR mutant non-small-cell lung cancer [J ] . Ann Oncol , 2022 , 33 ( 5 ): 466 - 487 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2022.02.003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2022.02.003 .
Sacher AG , Paweletz C , Dahlberg SE , et al . Prospective validation of rapid plasma genotyping for the detection of EGFR and KRAS mutations in advanced lung cancer [J ] . JAMA Oncol , 2016 , 2 ( 8 ): 1014 . https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016. 0173 https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0173 .
Otani H , Toyooka S , Soh J , et al . Detection of EGFR gene mutations using the wash fluid of CT-guided biopsy needle in NSCLC patients [J ] . J Thorac Oncol , 2008 , 3 ( 5 ): 472 - 476 . https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e31816de2cd https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e31816de2cd .
0
浏览量
28
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621