上消化道上皮下病变行内镜治疗后并发症的危险因素

李佩余; 黎思源; 刘少俊; 张德才

doi:10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2021.190368

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

上消化道上皮下病变行内镜治疗后并发症的危险因素

扫描看全文

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

论著 | 更新时间：2021-05-17

上消化道上皮下病变行内镜治疗后并发症的危险因素
Risk factors for complications of therapeutic endoscopy for upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions
中南大学学报(医学版) 中南大学学报(医学版) 2021年46卷第3期页码：278-282
作者机构：

中南大学湘雅三医院消化内科，长沙 410013
作者简介：

李佩余，Email: 36456761@qq.com, ORCID: 0000-0002-9501-0425
刘少俊，Email: cslsj169@126.com, ORCID: 0000-0002-8386-8109
张德才，Email: decaizhang@sina.com, ORCID: 0000-0002-8702-0148
基金信息：
DOI：10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2021.190368
中图分类号：
CSTR：
纸质出版日期： 2021-03-28 ，

收稿日期： 2019-05-10 ，

李佩余, 黎思源, 刘少俊, 张德才. 上消化道上皮下病变行内镜治疗后并发症的危险因素[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2021, 46(3): 278-282.

LI Peiyu, LI Siyuan, LIU Shaojun, ZHANG Decai. Risk factors for complications of therapeutic endoscopy for upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions[J]. Journal of Central South University. Medical Science, 2021, 46(3): 278-282.
李佩余, 黎思源, 刘少俊, 张德才. 上消化道上皮下病变行内镜治疗后并发症的危险因素[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2021, 46(3): 278-282. DOI：10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2021.190368

LI Peiyu, LI Siyuan, LIU Shaojun, ZHANG Decai. Risk factors for complications of therapeutic endoscopy for upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions[J]. Journal of Central South University. Medical Science, 2021, 46(3): 278-282. DOI：10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2021.190368

摘要

目的

研究上消化道上皮下病变(subepithelial lesions，SELs)行内镜治疗后并发症的危险因素。

方法

回顾性分析2014年9月至2019年9月中南大学湘雅三医院消化内科上消化道SELs行内镜治疗[包括内镜黏膜下剥离术(endoscopic submucosal dissection，ESD)，内镜下胃壁全层切除术(endoscopic full-thickness resection，EFR)，内镜黏膜下挖除术(endoscopic submucosal excavation，ESE)，内镜黏膜下隧道肿瘤切除术(submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection，STER)]后的184例患者的临床资料，分析术后并发症的危险因素。

结果

在184例患者中，并发症组22例(包括迟发性出血3例、迟发性穿孔2例、电凝综合征17例)，无并发症组162例。并发症组和无并发症组在性别、年龄、基础疾病、病变部位、病变累及层次、病理结果、内镜治疗方式、创面预防性封闭方面差异均无统计学意义(均

0.05)。两组患者在病变直径≥40 mm、操作时间≥120 min、术中穿孔率的差异均有统计学意义(均

0.05)。Logistic回归分析显示：病变直径≥40 mm和手术时间≥120 min为术后并发症发生的独立危险因素。

结论

对于病变直径≥40 mm、手术时间≥120 min的内镜手术治疗的上消化道SELs患者，需要高度警惕术后并发症的发生。

Abstract

Objective

To study the risk factors for complications after endoscopic therapy for upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions (SELs).

Methods

Retrospective analysis was performed on 184 patients in the Department of Gastroenterology in the Third Xiangya Hospital

Central South University after therapeutic endoscopy [endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)

endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFR)

endoscopic submucosal excavation (ESE)

and submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER)] for the upper gastrointestinal SELs from 2014-09-01 to 2019-09-30. The clinic data were collected and risk factors for postoperative complications were analyzed.

Results

Among the 184 patients

22 patients were in the complication group (including 3 cases of delayed bleeding

2 cases of delayed perforation

and 17 cases of electrocoagulation syndrome) and 162 patients were in the non-complication group. There was no significant difference between the complication group and the non-complication group in gender

age over 70 year

basic diseases

lesion location

lesion invasion layers

pathological results

endoscopic therapy

and preventive closure of wounds (all

0.05). The differences between the two groups in lesion diameter over 40 mm

operative time over 120 minutes

and rate of intraoperative perforation were significant (all

0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that lesion diameter over 40 mm and operative time over 120 minutes were independent risk factors for postoperative complications.

Conclusion

For the patients with upper gastrointestinal SELs after endoscopic minimally invasive therapy with the lesion diameter over 40 mm and the operative time over 120 minutes

it needs to highly alert to the occurrence of postoperative complications.

关键词

上皮下病变钛夹荷包缝合并发症危险因素

Keywords

subepithelial lesionstitanium clipspurse-string suturecomplicationsrisk factors

references

Faulx AL, Kothari S, Acosta RD, et al. The role of endoscopy in subepithelial lesions of the GI tract[J].Gastrointest Endosc, 2017, 85(6): 1117-1132.

Fletcher CD, Berman JJ, Corless C, et al. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a consensus approach[J].Hum Pathol, 2002, 33: 459-465.

Choi CW, Kim HW, Kang DH, et al. Clinical outcomes of second-look endoscopy after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: predictive factors with high risks of bleeding[J].Surg Endosc, 2014, 28(7): 2213-2220.

Goto O, Fujishiro M, Kodashima S, et al. A second-look endoscopy after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasm may be unnecessary: a retrospective analysis of postendoscopic submucosal dissection bleeding[J].Gastrointest Endosc, 2010, 71(2): 241-248.

Mukai S, Cho S, Kotachi T, et al. Analysis of delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasms[J].Gastroenterol Res Pract, 2012, 2012: 875323.

Kataoka Y, Tsuji Y, Sakaguchi Y, et al. Bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection: Risk factors and preventive methods[J].World J Gastroenterol, 2016, 22(26): 5927-5935.

Cho SJ, Choi IJ, Kim CG, et al. Aspirin use and bleeding risk after endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with gastric neoplasms[J].Endoscopy, 2012, 44(2): 114-121.

Matsumura T, Arai M, Maruoka D, et al. Risk factors for early and delayed post-operative bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric neoplasms, including patients with continued use of antithrombotic agents[J].BMC Gastroenterol, 2014, 14: 172.

Lee H, Cheoi KS, Chung H, et al. Clinical features and predictive factors of coagulation syndrome after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric neoplasm[J].Gastric Cancer, 2012, 15(1): 83-90.

Harada H, Suehiro S, Murakami D, et al. Clinical impact of prophylactic clip closure of mucosal defects after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection[J].Endosc Int Open, 2017, 5(12): E1165-E1171.

Yamasaki Y, Takeuchi Y, Iwatsubo T, et al. Line-assisted complete closure for a large mucosal defect after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection decreased post-electrocoagulation syndrome[J].Dig Endosc, 2018, 30(5): 633-641.

浏览量

119

下载量

CSCD

工具集

关联资源

心脏手术患者围术期肝素诱导的血小板减少症

原发性干燥综合征合并骨质疏松的危险因素

2019年中国脑卒中性别和年龄别疾病负担及其危险因素

肝移植术后革兰氏阳性球菌的感染特点及防治效果

原发性干燥综合征合并肺动脉高压的临床特征和危险因素